Ultimately, Jupe is earning a ton of money off of his childhood tragedy, stowing away feelings of grief in order to make thousands off of twisted tourists who want to see his macabre museum. But the costs are too high when dealing with an alpha predator. In Jupe’s case, it was the pursuit of being the ultimate showman, despite the risk, and for Antlers it was risking it all to get the ultimate evidence of aliens. Unfortunately, as OJ alluded to several times, predators can’t be tamed, so when Jean Jacket went rogue on Jupe, it was history repeating itself, and Jupe’s hubris was his downfall.įurthermore, mankind’s obsession with spectacle was what killed both Jupe and Antlers Holst (Michael Wincott), the cameraman who first warned Em about the danger of chasing the perfect shot. When the alien seemingly presented itself as another showbiz opportunity, he mistook the first six months of feeding horses to Jean Jacket as a trainer/animal relationship - similar to the sitcom, but forgetting the consequences. To the first point, Jupe’s folly was looking at his survival from the “Gordy’s Home” massacre optimistically. Many cases rejected by the claims commissioner but later approved by lawmakers have been dismissed by courts because of that issue, he said.2) Mankind will risk everything for spectacle. He said the Legislature would have to pass a special act pertaining to one person, and that kind of law has been deemed unconstitutional. But he said the Legislature does overturn the commissioner on occasion.īut even if lawmakers voted to allow Nash to sue, there would be legal problems with that decision, said New Haven lawyer Joel Faxon, who is not involved in Nash’s case. Gerald Fox III, a Stamford Democrat who’s co-chairman of the legislature’s Judiciary Committee. Lawmakers review many appeals of claims commissioner decisions each year and uphold most of the commissioner’s rulings, said state Rep. But he said state law on the issue was ambiguous and difficult to enforce, and there was no guarantee a court hearing would have led to a seizure order. Jepsen has acknowledged that the biologist had warned that the chimp was dangerous. “And I also pray that I hope this never happens to anyone else again. “I hope and pray that the commissioner will give me my day in court,” Nash had told reporters following a hearing last year before Vance. The $4 million settlement with Herold’s estate covers a small fraction of Nash’s medical costs, according to Nash’s lawyers, who have said she requires care and supervision around the clock. In October 2008, the biologist warned that the chimpanzee had reached maturity and “is very large and tremendously strong.” The biologist said, “I am concerned that if he feels threatened or if someone enters his territory, he could seriously hurt someone.” Several months before the attack, a state biologist warned state officials in a memo that the chimpanzee could seriously hurt someone if it felt threatened, saying “it is an accident waiting to happen.” Travis had previously bitten another woman’s hand and tried to drag her into a car in 1996, bit a man’s thumb two years later, and escaped from Herold’s home and roamed downtown Stamford for hours in 2003 before being captured, according to Nash’s lawsuit against Herold. The chimp could eat at the table, drink wine from a stemmed glass, use the toilet, and bathe and dress itself. Travis had starred in TV commercials for Old Navy and Coca-Cola when he was younger and made an appearance on “The Maury Povich Show.” The chimpanzee was the constant companion of the widowed Herold and was fed steak, lobster and ice cream. Nash now lives in a nursing home outside Boston. But the chimp went berserk and ripped off Nash’s nose, lips, eyelids and hands before being shot to death by a police officer. 16, 2009, to help lure her friend’s 200-pound chimpanzee, Travis, back inside. Nash, now 59, had gone to Herold’s home on Feb. State lawmakers did approve a ban on chimpanzees and other animals deemed dangerous a few months after Nash was mauled. He added, “If there was a failure by the DEP to seize the animal … the duty owed was to the general public and does not create a statutory obligation to ensure the safety of a private individual such as (Nash).” Nash was attacked, there was no statute that prohibited the private ownership of the chimpanzee nor was there any statutory language that would have created a duty to Ms. Vance said in his decision: “At the time Ms. “To decide otherwise would mean that the state simply could not afford to pass regulations intended to promote order and safety.” “While we have the utmost sympathy for Charla Nash, we agree with the claims commission that a regulatory statute does not provide a basis to sue the state,” Jepsen spokeswoman Jaclyn Falkowski said.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |